Questions?
The DLegal team is here to support. We will do our best to assist or connect you with those who can help.
Send Us a MessageNo Paper, No Problem? The Truth About Verbal Contracts in Alberta
Have you ever sealed a deal with a simple handshake? Maybe you agreed to lend a friend some money, promised to do a small job for someone, or had a business conversation that ended with a confident nod instead of paperwork. It’s a common situation, and it brings up an important question: Is a verbal contract legally binding? In theory, yes, some verbal agreements are legally binding. However, the challenge comes in trying to prove them.
Whether you’re a small business owner, a contractor, or just someone trying to keep things fair in a personal arrangement, knowing your rights when it comes to spoken promises matters. Verbal agreements are part of everyday life, but when things don’t go as planned, it helps to understand if those spoken words carry as much legal weight as a written agreement.
Verbal contracts are generally binding in Canada, provided they include typical contract elements. However, proof can be challenging without documentation or witness testimony, and some contracts need to be in writing, such as those for land, guarantees, and significant goods transactions, often due to the Statute of Frauds. Parties to a verbal agreement should be aware of these legal challenges and consider creating some form of written evidence or record to make it easier to enforce if legal disputes arise.
Aside from the special cases, a verbal agreement must contain all the elements of a valid contract for a court to enforce it. These key elements include:
For more information on what makes an agreement legally binding, read our article here.
If all these elements are present and no specific writing requirement applies, an oral agreement can be just as valid as a written contract under Alberta law. So then, the challenge lies not in the legal theory but in enforcing verbal contracts. Individuals or their contract lawyers will have to demonstrate to a court that these elements existed in a verbal exchange.
Alberta’s law, which is largely inherited from the historic Statute of Frauds, mandates that some types of contracts must be evidenced in writing to be enforceable in court. If a verbal contract falls into one of these categories without a formal written contract, a court will generally refuse to enforce it.
These categories, which required a written agreement, are as follows:
These categories illustrate that while most everyday agreements can be made in the form of a verbal contract, provincial legislation requires written documentation for significant transactions. If a verbal agreement falls afoul of these rules, it is not void per se, but it cannot be enforced by the courts.
There are some equitable exceptions, for example, the courts may enforce an oral land contract if there has been substantial partial performance unequivocally referable to the agreement, but such relief is discretionary and case-specific. In practice, for any important matter covered by these rules, a written contract is essential to avoid the unenforceability of a verbal contract.
The practical challenge with verbal agreements is proving their existence and terms in court. Unlike a written contract, there’s no document to point to as definitive evidence of what was agreed upon with a verbal agreement.
Enforcing a verbal contract often comes down to a credibility contest, sometimes described as a “he said, she said” scenario. The party seeking enforcement of a verbal contract must convince the judge, on a balance of probabilities, that a binding verbal agreement was indeed made and what its terms were. This can be not easy when memories have faded or if two or more parties recall the conversation differently. As a result, many otherwise valid verbal contracts fail in court due to a lack of sufficient evidence rather than a lack of legal validity.
To overcome this hurdle, litigation lawyers and courts look to any available evidence to support their claim beyond just the parties’ oral testimony. Common forms of supporting evidence for a verbal agreement include:
Using such evidence, the courts will piece together the broader circumstances, contractual terms, and context of the transaction to determine if a contract existed and what its terms were. The more evidence one can produce aligning with their version of the verbal contract, the more likely a court will be to rule in their favour.
Conversely, if it’s purely one person’s word against another’s with no corroboration, the claimant faces an uphill battle to prove an agreement existed. For this reason, even though verbal agreements are legally binding, it is prudent to document important agreements in writing whenever possible (whether that is employment agreements, personal transactions, informal agreements, or something else). A written contract or at least a written confirmation by an email, can save significant uncertainty and litigation risk down the road.
If you need help enforcing a verbal agreement or are considering putting your contract in writing, we’re here to support you. Whether it’s reviewing terms, drafting a clear agreement, or assessing a potential claim, get in touch with DLegal Law Office today. We’ll help you understand your options and protect your interests.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be considered legal or other professional advice. To get detailed information regarding your specific circumstances, please discuss your situation with a lawyer or other professional. Refer to our Legal Notice Legal Notice for more details.
The DLegal team is here to support. We will do our best to assist or connect you with those who can help.
Send Us a MessageSubscribe to our Newsletter to Stay Updated on Legal News
Notifications